Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21646.928250741@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> It'd probably be worthwhile to move NAMEDATALEN to config.h and make the
>> other two symbols be computed off NAMEDATALEN. Any objections if I
>> sneak that change into 6.5, or is it too close to being a "new feature"?
> Don't they have to be visible to outside apps, so it is in postgres_ext.h?
Good point --- I was thinking that postgres_ext.h includes config.h,
but I see it ain't so. You're right, those definitions must stay where
they are.
Still, I wonder why OIDNAMELEN isn't just defined as
(NAMEDATALEN+sizeof(Oid)) rather than putting a comment to that effect.
I will check the uses and see if that is a safe change or not.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: