Re: 8.0.0beta1 small inconsistency in pg_aggregate listing

Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:
> Maybe something wrong with the regproc type?

regprocout doesn't schema-qualify if the function name is unique without
it.

Of course, the function name isn't necessarily unique *with* it, either,
but regproc can't do anything about that.  Cast to regprocedure if you
want to see a more helpful display of the function.

            regards, tom lane