Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?
Дата
Msg-id 2162656.1715890703@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?
Список pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> For citext_utf8, I pushed cff4e5a3.  Hamerkop runs infrequently, so
> here's hoping for 100% green on master by Tuesday or so.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, it doesn't seem that changed anything:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hamerkop&dt=2024-05-16%2011%3A00%3A32

... and now that I look more closely, the reason why it didn't
change anything is that hamerkop is still building 0294df2
on HEAD.  All its other branches are equally stuck at the
end of March.  So this is a flat-out-broken animal, and I
plan to just ignore it until its owner un-sticks it.
(In particular, I think we shouldn't be in a hurry to push
the patch discussed downthread.)

Andrew: maybe the buildfarm server could be made to flag
animals building exceedingly old commits?  This is the second
problem of this sort that I've noticed this month, and you
really have to look closely to realize it's happening.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: gist index builds try to open FSM over and over
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GUC names in messages