Re: Python 3.1 support

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Python 3.1 support
Дата
Msg-id 21534.1258564018@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Python 3.1 support  (Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Python 3.1 support
Re: Python 3.1 support
Список pgsql-hackers
Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com> writes:
> Also, I am a little skeptical about this patch. I am sorry if this has
> already been discussed, but would this mean that I need to choose
> whether pl/python is built against Python 2.* or Python 3.*?

Yes.  That's exactly what I was complaining about upthread.  I'm not
a Python user, but from what I can gather of the 2-to-3 changes,
having to choose one at package build time is going to be a disaster.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nathan Boley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Python 3.1 support
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFC for adding typmods to functions