Re: WIP: RangeTypes
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP: RangeTypes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21519.1296425690@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WIP: RangeTypes (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WIP: RangeTypes
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 02:55 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
>> postgres=# select '[18,20]'::numrange @> 19;
>> ERROR: operator does not exist: numrange @> integer
>> LINE 1: select '[18,20]'::numrange @> 19;
>> ^
>> HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You
>> might need to add explicit type casts.
> It's because it doesn't know the type on the right side, and assumes
> it's an int4.
Well, yeah, it is an int4. The question ought to be phrased "why does
the parser fail to promote the int4 to numeric?". There might be some
excuse for an "operator is not unique" here, but I don't understand the
above failure --- it should be able to use an implicit coercion from
int4 to numeric.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: