Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
От | Wolfgang Walther |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 214ec3cc-7531-4360-8103-663581d2149f@technowledgy.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jacob Champion:
However, if the other deps are considered problematic as well, then the ship has already sailed, and there is not point for a special case here anymore.I think this line of argument is unlikely to find traction. Upthread there were people asking if we could maybe split out other possibly-unused dependencies in the future, like Kerberos.
Well, yes, that's kind of what I'm saying. There shouldn't be a special case for cURL, but those other deps should be handled equally as well.
And if that means making libpq modular at run-time, then this should be planned and built with all deps, and other use-cases (like static linking) in mind - and not like it is right now.
Best,
Wolfgang
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: