Re: Postgres Replaying WAL slowly
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgres Replaying WAL slowly |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21474.1404160784@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Postgres Replaying WAL slowly (Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Postgres Replaying WAL slowly
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com> writes:
> On Jun 30, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> So these are probably relations created in uncommitted
>> transactions. Possibly ON COMMIT DROP temp tables?
> That would make sense. There are definitely quite a few of those being used.
Uh-huh. I doubt that the mechanism that handles propagation of
AccessExclusiveLocks to the standby is smart enough to ignore locks
on temp tables :-(
> Another item of note is the system catalogs are quite bloated:
> Would that cause the replica to spin on StandbyReleaseLocks?
AFAIK, no. It's an unsurprising consequence of heavy use of short-lived
temp tables though.
So it seems like we have a candidate explanation. I'm a bit surprised
that StandbyReleaseLocks would get this slow if there are only a dozen
AccessExclusiveLocks in place at any one time, though. Perhaps that
was a low point and there are often many more?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: