Re: Removing "long int"-related limit on hash table sizes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Removing "long int"-related limit on hash table sizes
Дата
Msg-id 214170.1627331225@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Removing "long int"-related limit on hash table sizes  (ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker))
Ответы Re: Removing "long int"-related limit on hash table sizes
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=) writes:
> We also have the (U)INT64CONST() macros, which are about about two
> thirds as common as the U?LL? suffixes.

Yeah.  Ideally we'd forbid direct use of the suffixes and insist
you go through those macros, but I don't know of any way that
we could enforce such a coding rule, short of grepping the tree
periodically.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Dilger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)
Следующее
От: "Bossart, Nathan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: log_checkpoint's "WAL file(s) added" is misleading to the point of uselessness