Re: Unexpected chunk number
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unexpected chunk number |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21404.1158093856@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Unexpected chunk number (Chris Purcell <chris.purcell.39@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unexpected chunk number
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Chris Purcell <chris.purcell.39@gmail.com> writes:
>> That will get you past the reported problem, but I wonder what other
>> corruption is lurking ... once you've managed to pg_dump you'd better
>> inspect the data very carefully.
> Would the best advice be to get a pg_dump, then drop the database
> entirely and rebuild it?
Definitely. It's entirely possible for pg_dump to dump successfully
from a database that still contains corruption. An example:
broken indexes on user tables. COPY just does a seqscan and never looks
at the contents of indexes ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: