Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21403.1190036229@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used
Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 2:49 AM, in message
> <1190015368.148293.56830@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>, valgog
> <valgog@gmail.com> wrote:=20
>> Are you sure you understood what was the question?
>>
>> Is the TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY the same as TBL1.CATEGORY &
>> TBL2.CATEGORY > 0?
> Yes, given that he stipulated that one and only one bit would be set.
Really? In that case, isn't this bit-field just a bad implementation of
an enum-style field?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: