Re: [HACKERS] Removing select(2) based latch (was Unportable implementation of background worker start)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Removing select(2) based latch (was Unportable implementation of background worker start)
Дата
Msg-id 21379.1492725039@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Removing select(2) based latch (was Unportableimplementation of background worker start)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Removing select(2) based latch (was Unportableimplementation of background worker start)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-04-20 17:27:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In short: yeah, let's nuke the WAIT_USE_SELECT implementation.
>> It's dead code and it's unlikely to get resurrected.

> Ok, cool.  v10 or wait till v11?  I see very little reason to wait
> personally.

I feel no need to wait on that.  Code removal is not a "new feature".
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Use sync commit for logical replication apply in TAP tests
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Removing select(2) based latch (was Unportable implementation of background worker start)