Re: [HACKERS] Removing select(2) based latch (was Unportable implementation of background worker start)

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-04-20 17:27:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In short: yeah, let's nuke the WAIT_USE_SELECT implementation.
>> It's dead code and it's unlikely to get resurrected.

> Ok, cool.  v10 or wait till v11?  I see very little reason to wait
> personally.

I feel no need to wait on that.  Code removal is not a "new feature".
        regards, tom lane