Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:03:08PM -0700, Jeff Ross wrote:
>> If I put the same source code up on a ram disk, configure and compile it
>> the same way, all 96 tests pass.
> Interesting. Is this behavior consistent? What's different 'twixt
> the RAID disk and the RAM disk?
If the problem is at bottom a too low processes-per-user limit, as it
was for Jean-Gerard, then maybe the RAM-disk case passes because of
different timing details. This theory is a bit of a stretch though.
In any case, we're being shown the wrong output. What I want to know is
what appears in the postmaster log when these failures happen?
regards, tom lane