Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Дата
Msg-id 21283.1275676229@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Ответы Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC --- bump on incompatible change in WAL contents

> How can I get that from an existing data directory? I don't see it in
> pg_controldata output (unless it has a non-obvious alias).

You'd need to pull it out of one of the WAL files.  I'm not sure it's
worth the trouble ...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Следующее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?