Re: Authorizing select count()
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Authorizing select count() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2121518.1653542837@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Authorizing select count() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > I'm fairly sure that in the past we've considered this idea and rejected > it, mainly on the grounds that it's a completely gratuitous departure > from SQL standard. After some more digging I found the thread that (I think) the "mere pedantry" comment was referring to: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/Pine.LNX.4.44.0604131644260.20730-100000%40lnfm1.sai.msu.ru There's other nearby discussion at https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4476BABD.4080100%40zigo.dhs.org (note that that's referring to the klugy state of affairs before 108fe4730) Of course, that's just a couple of offhand email threads, which should not be mistaken for graven stone tablets. But I still don't see much advantage in deviating from the SQL-standard syntax for COUNT(*). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: