Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?

Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> Kris Jurka wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>> Since timestamp without timezone is a postgresql extension
>>
>> This is not true.
>>
> Well, one of them must be an extension so it is timestampz ?

timestamp with and without timezone are both required by the SQL
standard.  If JDBC only supports one of them I'd think the JDBC
spec is a tad broken.

            regards, tom lane