Re: AW: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: AW: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...
Дата
Msg-id 21145.983460929@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на AW: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...  (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Zeugswetter Andreas SB  <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at> writes:
>> it's certainly not what I thought we had agreed to implement.

> Hmm, strange. I thought that we had agreed upon a 32 bit CRC
> on the grounds, that it would be strong enough to guard a single
> log record.

I thought that, and still think it, but I was outvoted.  However I
see no value in the present actual implementation ...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Olivier PRENANT
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Следующее
От: Emmanuel Charpentier
Дата:
Сообщение: Current ODBC driver(s) problems with 7.1