Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21141.1546199123@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Unified logging system for command-line programs (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs
Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I have developed a patch that unifies the various ad hoc logging
> (message printing, error printing) systems used throughout the
> command-line programs.
I've not read the patch in any detail, but +1 for making this more
uniform.
> - Common files (common/, fe_utils/, etc.) can handle logging much more
> simply by just using one API without worrying too much about the context
> of the calling program, requiring callbacks, or having to pass
> "progname" around everywhere.
It seems like a shame that src/common files still need to have
#ifdef FRONTEND variant code to deal with frontend vs. backend
conventions. I wonder how hard it would be to layer some subset of
ereport() functionality on top of what you have here, so as to get
rid of those #ifdef stanzas.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: