Re: role self-revocation

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I'm not quite following this bit.  Where would SET ROLE come into play
> when we're talking about old dump scripts and how the commands in those
> scripts might be interpreted by newer versions of PG..?

No, the concern there is the other way around: what if you take a
script made by newer pg_dump and try to load it into an older server
that doesn't have the GRANTED BY option?

We're accustomed to saying that that doesn't work if you use a
database feature that didn't exist in the old server, but
privilege grants are hardly that.  I don't want us to change the
pg_dump output in such a way that the grants can't be restored at all
to an older server, just because of a syntax choice that we could
make backwards-compatibly instead of not-backwards-compatibly.

            regards, tom lane