Re: pg_locks view and user locks
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_locks view and user locks |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21071.1095107989@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_locks view and user locks (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> That's the whole problem. I don't think anyone objects to the user lock
> principle, but as long as it's GPL, we won't support it. It was
> probably a mistake to accept this module in the first place. I believe
> some people have been trying to get the module relicensed, but that
> evidently never happened.
I said some time ago that I would pester contrib authors about fixing
license issues, but it still hasn't gotten to the top of my to-do list :-(
AFAIK nothing at all has been done on this score.
If Merlin is hot about contrib/userlock right now, he's welcome to try
to contact the original author and get this dealt with.
The point about not importing documentation from a mislicensed contrib
module is valid IMHO.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: