Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT
Дата
Msg-id 21068.1176874394@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT  (Martin Langhoff <martin@catalyst.net.nz>)
Ответы Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT  (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>)
Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT  (Martin Langhoff <martin@catalyst.net.nz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Martin Langhoff <martin@catalyst.net.nz> writes:
> Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
>> And remember the warning I gave that my conversion is *not* a direct CVS
>> import - I intentionally *unexpand* all Keywords before stuffing them
>> into GIT so that merging and branching can ignore all the Keyword
>> conflicts... 

> My import is unexpanding those as well to support rebasing and merging
> better.

Um ... why do either of you feel there's an issue there?

We switched over to $PostgreSQL$ a few years ago specifically to avoid
creating merge problems for downstream repositories.  If there are any
other keyword expansions left in the source text I'd vote to remove
them.  If you have a problem with $PostgreSQL$, why?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout