Re: .NET or Mono functions in PG

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: .NET or Mono functions in PG
Дата
Msg-id 21030.1196526238@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: .NET or Mono functions in PG  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: .NET or Mono functions in PG  (James Mansion <james@mansionfamily.plus.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> James Mansion wrote:
>> Is that necessarily a problem?
> ...
> And yes, it would be the same as embedding Java. And it has been done
> with pl/java, so it can be done :)

It is also pretty well established that if pltcl or plperl cause the
backend to become multithreaded, things break horribly.  I strongly
suspect that the only reason we've not seen similar reports about
other PLs that might introduce extra threads is that the market
penetration of other PLs is epsilon.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: compiling postgres in winxp
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [GENERAL] plperl and regexps with accented characters - incompatible?