Re: .NET or Mono functions in PG

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> James Mansion wrote:
>> Is that necessarily a problem?
> ...
> And yes, it would be the same as embedding Java. And it has been done
> with pl/java, so it can be done :)

It is also pretty well established that if pltcl or plperl cause the
backend to become multithreaded, things break horribly.  I strongly
suspect that the only reason we've not seen similar reports about
other PLs that might introduce extra threads is that the market
penetration of other PLs is epsilon.
        regards, tom lane