Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support

Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> One note; this change
>> ! get_fn_expr_rettype(FunctionCallInfo fcinfo)
>> to
>> ! get_fn_expr_rettype(FmgrInfo *flinfo)

> is a good example why some things, particularly PLs, are better off
> being in the main source tree rather than on gborg (or someplace else).
> PL/R uses get_fn_expr_rettype() and get_fn_expr_argtype(), so it's now
> broken as of CVS tip :(

Sorry about that.  I suspected you had some calls I didn't know about,
but there wasn't much I could do about 'em; and I wanted to correct the
function signatures before anything else started to depend on them.

            regards, tom lane