Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful
Дата
Msg-id 20981.1150049292@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Ответы Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful
Список pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:32:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we should try very hard to get rid of the longjmp in the signal
>> handler altogether.

> I submitted a patch for this ages ago and AFAIK it's still in the
> queue. Have you any issues with the way I did it there?

If you're speaking of 
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-10/msg00194.php
it doesn't appear to me to remove longjmp from the signal handler.
Was there a later version?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful
Следующее
От: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Дата:
Сообщение: pl/tcl regression failed