Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> � �could not accept connection from the standby because max_wal_senders is 0

> Well, that might still leave someone confused if they had one standby
> and were trying to bring up a second one.

I'd suggest something like "number of requested standby connections
exceeds max_wal_senders (currently %d)"
        regards, tom lane