Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On February 12, 2014 10:23:21 PM CET, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> There are cases where one module needs symbols from another directly.
>> Would that be affected by this?

> I don't think we have real infrastructure for that yet. Neither from the POV of loading several .so's, nor from a
symbolvisibility. Afaics we'd need a working definition of PGDLLIMPORT which inverts the declspecs. I think Tom just
removedthe remnants of that.
 

No, I've not touched the PGDLLIMPORT macros.  I was hoping to, but it
looks like we're not getting there :-(
        regards, tom lane