Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> But actually I thought we had more or less concluded that CREATE OR
>> REPLACE LANGUAGE would be acceptable (perhaps only if it's given
>> without any extra args?).
> I'm not sure there's any value in that restriction - seems more
> confusing than helpful.
The point would be to reduce the risk that you're changing the language
definition in a surprising way. Extra args would imply that you're
trying to install a non-default definition of the language.
regards, tom lane