Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 10/12/2011 02:21 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I guess the failure scenario is if someone has an extension from 9.1.2
>> and tries to load it into 9.1.1 or earlier, in which case they will
>> get a syntax error or somehing when trying to run the CREATE EXTENSION
>> command, right? I doubt that's something worth dealing with - it's a
>> lot less likely to happen.
> As long as we are going to apply it for 9.1 and not wait for 9.2 I don't
> think there will be much problem. I think this is one of the rare cases
> where we should apply a change to the stable release.
By 9.2 doing this would be rather pointless, likely. Also, the earlier
we get it in the easier it will be for third-party devs to rely on it
working.
regards, tom lane