Re: plpgsql FOR loop doesn't guard against strange step values

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: plpgsql FOR loop doesn't guard against strange step values
Дата
Msg-id 20942.1184678866@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plpgsql FOR loop doesn't guard against strange step values  ("Jaime Casanova" <systemguards@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
"Jaime Casanova" <systemguards@gmail.com> writes:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-07/msg00142.php
> at least the part that prevents overflow and probably the one that
> reject zero in BY are clearly bugs and should be backpatched to 8.2,
> aren't they?

Well, it's a behavioral change, so given the lack of complaints from the
field I'm inclined not to back-patch.
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Straightforward changes for increased SMP scalability
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Earlier suggestion to get gcov to work by adding $(CFLAGS) to module link line