Re: Initdb failure

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Initdb failure
Дата
Msg-id 20882.1564065853@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Initdb failure  (Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Initdb failure  (Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 13:50, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Initdb fails when following path is provided as input:
>>>
datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/

> Now that you say this, it does make sense to atleast inform about the
> correct error and that too earlier. Something like the attached patch
> would make sense.

I am not terribly excited about putting effort into this at all, because
I don't think that any actual user anywhere will ever get any benefit.
The proposed test case is just silly.

However, if we are going to put effort into it, it needs to be more than
this.  First off, what is the actual failure point?  (It's surely less
than MAXPGPATH, because we tend to append subdirectory/file names onto
whatever is given.)  Second, what of absolute versus relative paths?
If converting the given path to absolute makes it exceed MAXPGPATH,
is that a problem?

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sepgsql seems rather thoroughly broken on Fedora 30