Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20806.1189744295@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not?
Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> FYI, after some tinkering around, I've found that RETURNING is 100%
> incompatible with any table which has conditional DO INSTEAD rules; there's
> just no way to make it work and return any intelligible data. This would be
> a completely corner case, except that people use conditional DO INSTEAD rules
> heavily with partitioning (and yes, real users are complaining).
Those would be real users who are not on any PG mailing list? Cause I
have not seen any complaints, much less any proposals for a solution...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: