Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I am attaching a diff to fix the problem. We were reporting only a
> 2-digit year, and tm_year reports years since 1900, so it was reporting
> 100 for year 2000. The field was %02d, but the number was three digits
> so it printed all three.
If you are going to go to 4-digit years in timestamps, I think you also
need to increase the TIMESTAMP_SIZE constant used by elog.c when
ELOG_TIMESTAMPS is set.
An alternative solution is to print time->tm_year % 100.
Either of these solutions might break existing programs that analyze
logfiles, if any there be...
regards, tom lane