Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 01/27/2015 12:24 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> +1 for splitting development that way. Fixing the use of escape_json() is
>> objective, but the choices around the warning are more subtle.
> OK, so something like this patch? I'm mildly concerned that you and I
> are the only ones commenting on this.
Doesn't seem to me like this fixes anything. If the content of a jsonb
value is correct, the output will be the same with or without this patch;
and if it's not, this isn't going to really improve matters.
I think coding anything is premature until we decide how we're going to
deal with the fundamental ambiguity.
regards, tom lane