Re: c language functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: c language functions
Дата
Msg-id 20716.1365014379@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: c language functions  (Rodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: c language functions
Список pgsql-hackers
Rodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj@gmail.com> writes:
> Why not useful?
> If I don't make it receive anyelement, I will have to create an add
> function for each type.

If you make it anyelement, then you're contracting to be able to add
any datatype whatsoever to a my_uint.  This is nonsensical.

You'd be better off declaring several specific addition functions,
one for each other type.  This will be an order of magnitude easier
to write, and probably run an order of magnitude faster too, because
just checking to see what type you got would already be significantly
more expensive than adding a couple of integers ought to be.

Look at the built-in types and functions for precedent.  There are
indeed separate functions for int2 + int2, int2 + int4, int4 + int2,
int4 + int4, etc etc.  If we were starting from scratch, we might reduce
that to just int4 + int4 and rely on the implicit coercion from int2 to
int4 to handle the other cases; but there's no way we'd put in run-time
type determination.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL)
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CREATE EXTENSION BLOCKS