Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down
От | Antonin Houska |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20715.1582793501@antos обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down (legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com> wrote: > Antonin Houska-2 wrote > > Right now I recall two problems: 1) is the way I currently store > > RelOptInfo for the grouped relations correct?, 2) how should we handle > > types for which logical equality does not imply physical (byte-wise) > > equality? > > > > Fortunately it seems now that I'm not the only one who cares about 2), so > > this > > problem might be resolved soon: > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAH2-Wzn3Ee49Gmxb7V1VJ3-AC8fWn-Fr8pfWQebHe8rYRxt5OQ%40mail.gmail.com > > > > But 1) still remains. > > > > Hello > would "pgsql: Add equalimage B-Tree support functions." > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1j72NY-0002gi-2B@gemulon.postgresql.org Yes, it seems so. I'll adapt the patch soon, hopefully next week. Thanks for reminder. -- Antonin Houska Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: