Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> Here's another version of this patch ;-) I've based it on your patch, so
> the changes to ovalue etc should sitill be there.

This looks fairly reasonable to me, but I'm feeling a bit gun-shy after
the previous fiasco.  Before we consider applying it so late in beta,
I'd like to get Merlin or another one of the win32 hackers to sign off
on the patch too.
        regards, tom lane