Re: Q: fixing collation version mismatches
| От | Daniel Verite |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Q: fixing collation version mismatches |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 206a0d6b-d91d-4fc9-a467-2bcf426fed06@manitou-mail.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Q: fixing collation version mismatches (Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Q: fixing collation version mismatches
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Karsten Hilbert wrote: > Which is why my question still stands: does the above > three-strikes operation safely take care of any collation > issues that may currently exist in a database ? For the indexes, yes, but theorically, all constraints involving collatable types need a recheck. For foreign key constraints with non-deterministic collations, there might be equality tests that pass with an older Unicode version and fail with a newer Unicode version. For check constraints as well, checks applied to strings with recent Unicode characters can give different results after an upgrade. Best regards, -- Daniel Vérité https://postgresql.verite.pro/ Twitter: @DanielVerite
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: