Re: Concurrent psql patch

Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "David Fetter" <david@fetter.org> writes:
>> What's the reasoning behind \c&?  Does it "send things into the
>> background" the way & does in the shell?

> Sort of. It sends the *subsequent* command to the background...

That sounds just bizarre.  Existing backslash commands that do something
to a SQL command are typed *after* the command they affect (\g for
instance).  I don't think you should randomly change that.

            regards, tom lane