Re: Unable to restore dump due to client encoding issues -- or, when is SQL_ASCII really UTF8
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unable to restore dump due to client encoding issues -- or, when is SQL_ASCII really UTF8 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20667.1172592953@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Unable to restore dump due to client encoding issues -- or, when is SQL_ASCII really UTF8 (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unable to restore dump due to client encoding issues
-- or, when is SQL_ASCII really UTF8
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> writes:
> In response to Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>:
>>> Connecting to the database and issuing "show client_encoding" shows that
>>> the database is indeed set to SQL_ASCII.
>>
>> client_encoding doesn't show the database encoding, it shows the
>> client encoding; execute "show server_encoding" to see the database
>> encoding.
> The database was, indeed, UTF8, which is the default on newer Postgres.
No, it's not necessarily the default --- the default is the encoding
used by whatever locale you initdb'd in. But what I find odd about the
above is that client_encoding should default to equal server_encoding
unless something on the client side specifically overrides it. The
above behavior suggests that you've got a .psqlrc or PGCLIENTENCODING
environment variable or some such that is forcing client_encoding to
SQL_ASCII when the server encoding is something different. That strikes
me as a pretty bad practice; there is use for forcing client_encoding to
something specific, but forcing it to SQL_ASCII seems useless and
possibly dangerous.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: