Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 4/5/17 09:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> - Maybe add a check to opr_sanity to make sure the default set of
>>> functions is configured the way we want?
>> That seems like a good idea.
> patch
Looks sane to me, although I wonder if opr_sanity ought to be looking
for any other combinations.
regards, tom lane