Re: dblink patches for comment

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: dblink patches for comment
Дата
Msg-id 20613.1243466644@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на dblink patches for comment  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Ответы Re: dblink patches for comment  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Re: dblink patches for comment  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> The attached addresses items#2 and 3 as listed by Bruce here:
>    http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgsql/joe

> I think it is consistent with the discussions we had a PGCon last week. 
> Any objections to me committing this for 8.4?

It's hard to review it without any docs that say what it's supposed to do.
(And you'd need to patch the docs anyway, eh?)

> On a side note, should I try to address items #1 & #4 for 8.4 as well? 
> Perhaps #4 yes since it is arguably a bug fix, but no to #1?

Yeah, my feeling too.  #1 is a new feature that was submitted too late
for 8.4.  I wouldn't have argued if you'd committed it anyway during
the commitfest, but it's definitely too late now.  But #4 seems like
a bugfix.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Positive build result on SuSE
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions