Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Well, I think you're pointing out some things that need to be figured
> out, but I hardly think that's a good enough reason to pour cold water
> on the whole approach.
If somebody feels like doing the legwork to find out if those performance
hazards are real (which I freely concede they may not be), fine. I'm just
saying this isn't a slam-dunk commit-it-and-move-on win.
regards, tom lane