Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE
Дата
Msg-id 20577.1401894522@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Btw, I had wondered before if we shouldn't also add sizeof(long) to
> pg_control to catch cases where a database is copied between a LLP64
> (64bit windows) and an LP64 (nearly every other 64bit system) system. I
> have my doubts that we're completely clean about the size
> difference. Not to speak of extension datatypes.

I don't believe that this is necessary.  It's certainly true that some
in-memory structures will be laid out differently, but not on-disk.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Migrating from 9.2.4 to 9.3.0 with XML DOCTYPE
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Could not open file pg_multixact/offsets/ ERROR on 9.3.4