Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Дата
Msg-id 20532.1534872560@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> So, does anyone with Windows build experience want to comment on this?
> The proposal is to desupport anything older than (probably) MSVC 2013,
> or alternatively anything that cannot compile the attached test file.

We've got a buildfarm handy that could answer the question.
Let's just stick a test function in there for a day and see
which animals fail.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexandra Ryzhevich
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Add regress test for pg_read_all_stats role
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)