Re: $foo $bar is BAD
| От | Jan de Visser |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: $foo $bar is BAD |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2051528.XhJx27HHnp@coyote обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: $foo $bar is BAD (Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 8:13:56 PM EDT Melvin Davidson wrote: > *Thanks for the sympathetic feedback John. I understand people are > reluctant to change. It was just my intent to enlighten others as to the > true background behind it.* > *So if it's not about to change, then I'll just have to cry $boo $hoo, $oye > $vey. :)* Reading this: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/a/80609 it appears to me that the true origin is not what you claim it to be, but pre- war MIT pranksters. And besides: language evolves. Words change meaning over time. Nobody typing 'foo = 2*bar' thinks about WW2 acronym, and everybody reading it immediately understands it, again without referring to that acronym. The horse is dead, Jim. Stop beating it.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: