Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Дата
Msg-id
20438.1586228437@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) (Tomas Vondra)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Tomas Vondra writes: > I came to the same conclusion (that the change in TuplesortMethod > definiton is the culprit) a while ago and was about to push a fix that > initialized it correctly in ExecSortInitializeDSM. But I agree reverting > it back to the old definition is probably better. Yeah, for the moment. James would like to not have SORT_TYPE_STILL_IN_PROGRESS be part of the enum at all, I think, and I can see his point --- but then we need some out-of-band representation of "worker not done", so I'm not sure there'll be any net reduction of cruft. Anyway that can be dealt with after we have a stable buildfarm. Note also that there's a separate comment-only patch in that shouldn't be forgotten about. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Дата: