Re: Non-portable shell code in pg_upgrade tap tests

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Non-portable shell code in pg_upgrade tap tests
Дата
Msg-id 20428.1532318461@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Non-portable shell code in pg_upgrade tap tests  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 02:53:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A quick trawl of the buildfarm logs says most of our animals compute
>> SHELL = /bin/sh anyway, and so would be unaffected.  There's a sizable
>> population that find /bin/bash though, and one active critter that finds
>> /bin/ksh.

> Except for the FreeBSD boxes, right?  I thought that using directly
> /bin/ and not /usr/local/bin/ was considered an abuse of Linux in their
> universe.

No, I'm pretty sure that "sh" wins a place in /bin even on FreeBSD ;-)

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Tips on committing
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?