Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2041.1263224692@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pg_dump sort order for functions (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> pg_dump sorts its output first by object type, then by object name, and
> then processes all that for dependencies. This works well, but for
> overloaded functions this still gives a random sort order that can
> produce annoying diffs in the dump.
> Would it be acceptable to introduce a secondary sort key field into the
> DumpableObject struct that functions would fill with, say, the argument
> types (maybe something like "text,int,int" -- need to play with this a
> little)?
I think you could probably use the existing tag field; no need for a new
one. The real problem is that an object-type-specific sort rule is a
bit klugy. IIRC there is discussion of this in the archives already ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: