Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure there are re-implementations of Expect out there that
>> don't use Tcl; would you be happier with, say, a perl-based tool?
> Yes, because we already have a dependency on perl. But don't be
> surprised if we can't find such a beast, especially one that runs under
> the weird MSys DTK perl -
[ digs... ] It looks like what I was remembering is
http://search.cpan.org/~lbrocard/Test-Expect-0.29/lib/Test/Expect.pm
which seems to leave all the interesting problems (like driving more
than one program-under-test) to the user's own devices. Sigh.
regards, tom lane