Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:38:29AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I agree that we should do something about this. I haven't reviewed
>> your patches but the approach sounds broadly reasonable.
> Yep, we went down the road in PG 18 to convert syntax, and now we have
> to fix this, or we have to revert all the PG 18 syntax changes, which
> seems like a step backward.
I'm confused? 0dca5d68d didn't have anything to do with
syntax changes, just with when planning happens.
regards, tom lane