Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tatsuo Ishii
Тема Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
Дата
Msg-id 20260403.090640.487260902102768591.ishii@postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
Список pgsql-hackers
Thomas,

It seems there's remaining "Mule internal" in
doc/src/sgml/charset.sgml in your patch.

  <para>
   The character set support in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
   allows you to store text in a variety of character sets (also called
   encodings), including
   single-byte character sets such as the ISO 8859 series and
   multiple-byte character sets such as <acronym>EUC</acronym> (Extended Unix
   Code), UTF-8, and Mule internal code.  All supported character sets
                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~             

Regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: