Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
| От | Tatsuo Ishii |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20260403.090640.487260902102768591.ishii@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL? (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas,
It seems there's remaining "Mule internal" in
doc/src/sgml/charset.sgml in your patch.
<para>
The character set support in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
allows you to store text in a variety of character sets (also called
encodings), including
single-byte character sets such as the ISO 8859 series and
multiple-byte character sets such as <acronym>EUC</acronym> (Extended Unix
Code), UTF-8, and Mule internal code. All supported character sets
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: